|
Post by Helen Dagner on Jul 18, 2013 12:03:45 GMT -5
LinkedIn Customer Support Message Subject: STOP!!! GGET ME OFF YOUR SITE!!! Thanks for contacting us. Someone from our support team will get back to you as soon as possible. If you can sign in to your LinkedIn account, you can check the status of your submitted tickets any time in the Support History section of our Help Center. Regards, Your LinkedIn Customer Experience Team
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Jul 18, 2013 12:06:12 GMT -5
Helen,My husband had a good suggestion for you too, if it will work. He said with the nerve damage in your finger/hand, to try using a pencil to type with. I said I'd pass it along! Lol. Jean
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Jul 18, 2013 12:08:08 GMT -5
Helen, Your responses to him are really good. I am so glad I listened to my gut and never contacted him - God knows how I would have bumbled things up. Probably would end up crying or chewing him out or believing his first excuse or something. Sue
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Jul 18, 2013 12:10:27 GMT -5
Outraged? Perhaps you should have softened it up a bit, Helen. He probably considers it "making love". What a jerk-off. I think I'm going to request his court file from Xxxx Xxxx xxx Circuit Court. Sounds like we may need them. Dave
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Jul 18, 2013 12:13:27 GMT -5
Helen, Well, that’s nice eh changed his attitude. Did he provide you with any answers? Did he know any of the Hastings clan, Busch, Shaffer, Harold Clayton Anderson, etc.? I agree he did his time but he needs to reveal what and who he knows. Frank
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Jul 18, 2013 12:15:22 GMT -5
Wow. That’s interesting. He has to “think about his answers” ?? At least the communication lines are still open. Bob
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Jul 18, 2013 12:17:55 GMT -5
Helen, And likewise, great answer on your board. Keep that picture of John and Tom sitting next to each other which I sent you from Facebook. This may become handy at some point.
Although Mike Stebbins doesn’t recognize the names, he may recognize the faces. Jim
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Jul 18, 2013 12:20:53 GMT -5
Lol. No, I didn’t send it because I don’t have it. What court was it filed in…I will get it for you. If you don’t know off-hand, don’t worry about it, I probably still hunt it down.
So far preliminary search for videos that somewhat feature Stebbins (at least more than a mention or a passing photo) has not yielded a lot. The poor kid was the red-headed step child or something—he seems to be overshadowed a lot in the media/by the other families. But here are three links for your review. I couldn’t look at the vid from The Oakland Press, as it didn’t work with the video player on my machine. I will look for more in the AM. Xxxx
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Jul 18, 2013 12:23:51 GMT -5
Same thing happen to me Helen,Yeah, after I finally got the email to reset my password it turns out I need his date of birth!!!! Xxxxxx
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Jul 18, 2013 12:26:35 GMT -5
Heck no. What's your phone number again? Don
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Jul 18, 2013 12:29:13 GMT -5
I just read your post on Topix to Pill. What IS his deal? And do you think he's Bob? I sometimes wonder...Liz
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Jul 18, 2013 12:55:34 GMT -5
Helen,
What do you make of the recent activity on the warrants of Frank Shelden and Dyer Grossman? The third part of the court docket information, Events, indicates recent activity on the warrants; i.e., a possible “nolle pros,” a nolle prosecution? I’ve heard of nolo contendere in criminal cases, but with my limited experience in state criminal cases, I am not at all familiar with this term.
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Jul 18, 2013 13:07:08 GMT -5
Helen, What do you make of the recent activity on the warrants of Frank Shelden and Dyer Grossman? The third part of the court docket information, Events, indicates recent activity on the warrants; i.e., a possible “nolle pros,” a nolle prosecution? I’ve heard of nolo contendere in criminal cases, but with my limited experience in state criminal cases, I am not at all familiar with this term. This meant the prosecutor formally declared on record that prosecution would no longer be pursued. When asked by the judge why the case was no longer pursued, the prosecutor asked to approach (to speak to the judge away from the general hearing of those in the courtroom). The prosecutor quietly stated that the officer making the charges was no longer a police officer. “Voluntarily or involuntarily?” the judge inquired. I was unable to hear the prosecutor’s response. I did, however hear the prosecutor state that one of the managers who was an eyewitness to the incident did not “corroborate” the officer’s story. What lead to this * There is quite a few reasons for this-mite be true that Gerald Richards is Dead,and therefore can not testify against them-you know rather than speculate-lets wait until I read their new activity files--
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Jul 18, 2013 13:14:26 GMT -5
Nolle Prosequi (nol-ee pros-ee-kwee) Latin for "we shall no longer prosecute." At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case or a plaintiff in a civil case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. In a criminal case, the statement is an admission that the charges cannot be proved or that evidence has demonstrated either innocence or a fatal flaw in the prosecution's claim. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judges permission to nol-pros a case.
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Jul 18, 2013 13:49:59 GMT -5
Note: Just thought I would let you know...That I have become very popular in the Netherlands....Interesting?
|
|