Post by Helen Dagner on Oct 29, 2006 14:52:07 GMT -5
THIS WAS ONE OF MY ANSWERS TO THE TASK FORCE~~I HAVE NOT FOUND THE LETTER THEY SENT ME...THAT THIS REPLY ANSWERS....BUT I WILL....AND THEN WILL ALSO POST IT~ OCCK TASK FORCE
Your email showed remarkable restraint, probably b/c you thought I would post it. hey, fair enough--the time line was not submitted as a tip, but I am as frustrated as you are.. Also in fairness, however, the time line is explicitly described as based on old press reports, the internet, and memory of what was posted on a prior website, by someone who also explicitly admitted have no inside knowledge and that there were gaps and inaccuracies (because no one can vouch for the veracity of even the stuff printed in the press at the time). There are a few editorial comments, but these are obviously made by the author (who also said "take it for what it's worth"). the timeline states (and this is probably partially in error) that none of the promised forensic "retesting" has taken place. However, we are allowed to ask questions and make comments, that's the society we live in. The timeline is nothing more than a plausible way for an outsider looking in to view what's happened in this case. The post even states that any actions taken by LE that are not a part of the public record obviously cannot be included. Let's face it, the case was irrevocably botched decades before it ever landed on your desk. The best we can hope for is that the stuff causes some possible rethinking on the case, but I am certainly not counting on it. Well then I'm totally lost.
It sure would be nice to know what is true and what is not. I still
wonder if previous investigators have fed you a bunch of
mis-information and your simply chasing your tail. The only thing
we know for a fact is that there have been witnesses that have been
ignored for the last thirty years. That seems to be the only established
fact of this whole thing! And that fact has nothing to do
I repeat nothing to do with me or John.~~You state that the timeline is full of inaccuracies-false statements-tibits of facts-can be found in newspaper articles ect~~that was the point stated by the poster~~None of my Info appears in that timeline~It is too bad in your Generic answer-that you didn't specifty all those untruths-As I would certainly correct them~~Or are we to wait for Heathers nexts News Blitzs....to get the rest of the story.....Sincerely,Helendagner.com
_________________
Your email showed remarkable restraint, probably b/c you thought I would post it. hey, fair enough--the time line was not submitted as a tip, but I am as frustrated as you are.. Also in fairness, however, the time line is explicitly described as based on old press reports, the internet, and memory of what was posted on a prior website, by someone who also explicitly admitted have no inside knowledge and that there were gaps and inaccuracies (because no one can vouch for the veracity of even the stuff printed in the press at the time). There are a few editorial comments, but these are obviously made by the author (who also said "take it for what it's worth"). the timeline states (and this is probably partially in error) that none of the promised forensic "retesting" has taken place. However, we are allowed to ask questions and make comments, that's the society we live in. The timeline is nothing more than a plausible way for an outsider looking in to view what's happened in this case. The post even states that any actions taken by LE that are not a part of the public record obviously cannot be included. Let's face it, the case was irrevocably botched decades before it ever landed on your desk. The best we can hope for is that the stuff causes some possible rethinking on the case, but I am certainly not counting on it. Well then I'm totally lost.
It sure would be nice to know what is true and what is not. I still
wonder if previous investigators have fed you a bunch of
mis-information and your simply chasing your tail. The only thing
we know for a fact is that there have been witnesses that have been
ignored for the last thirty years. That seems to be the only established
fact of this whole thing! And that fact has nothing to do
I repeat nothing to do with me or John.~~You state that the timeline is full of inaccuracies-false statements-tibits of facts-can be found in newspaper articles ect~~that was the point stated by the poster~~None of my Info appears in that timeline~It is too bad in your Generic answer-that you didn't specifty all those untruths-As I would certainly correct them~~Or are we to wait for Heathers nexts News Blitzs....to get the rest of the story.....Sincerely,Helendagner.com
_________________
