|
Post by Helen Dagner on Oct 10, 2012 23:57:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Oct 11, 2012 2:11:12 GMT -5
The Precedence of Our Judicial System Concerning Future Pedophiles With Regards to the Jerry Sandusky Case
Sometimes, in a game, it takes a while to figure out the strategy of your opponent, and concerning the case of Jerry Sandusky, I have to say that future pedophiles are cheering right now.
It was a brilliant move. Take an old, famous, well liked football hero of sorts, connect him solely to the child abuse at Penn State and his children’s foundation, find him guilty and then sentence him to only 30-60 years. Yes, it is true that he will probably never see the light of free ground again in his lifetime, but it is setting precedence for future cases to argue such a light sentence- esp. given the famous life and name connected in the media with Sandusky. One would think anyway.
However, John DeCamp is correct when he states that Penn State and Franklin Credit are connected- and that is that it is the same people getting rich from the same activity concerning the prostitution of boys, and more than likely- since Sandusky was connected to many of the people who revolved around the real Franklin case, as was Joe Paterno- associating with the same people at the same functions where men who were are known to have been doing the same exact thing here in Omaha says something I think. I don’t know- it is the same deal- and the same cover up- it is just that Penn State isn’t thirty years old.
Knowing what I know about Omaha, it is hard not to become cynical and think that things are going to turn out the same way- like when they convicted Larry King and sentenced him to prison on the bilking of the credit union, although NO charges concerning children of any sort were ever brought against him, let alone anyone else who was connected to the mess, and let me assure you- those connections were and obviously still are pretty vast. What I am trying to say is that Sandusky is being used as a scapegoat to cover up a much bigger issue at Penn State and the children’s foundation just like Larry King was used as a scapegoat to get the heat off of the REAL people involved in the mess here in Omaha that was prevalent from the 50’s to the early 90’s. (At least that is what I know from my family’s involvement- although it could extent back much farther than that).
I have had a smear campaign going on behind the scenes and I have been asked why I continue when it seems that no one can win the kind of fight that I am waging- but I am saying that there are some incredibly rich men connected to a child abduction ring here in Omaha and I would assume that since we just had a problem with Penn State that it is quite possible that old habits die hard. What I am facing is incredible- and so well-orchestrated that I have no idea who is truly behind it. But the truth is worth fighting for- and I believe, again, just like Mr. John DeCamp- that Penn State and Franklin could TRULY be connected, which tells me that what I went through as a child didn’t stop- but rather moved and grew in complexity, like a disease. Children are at stake here- so I fight for this cause, even though I am a gay man who doesn’t much care to be around kids. I say that because if I can get off my behind and get involved, I don’t see why others can’t as well. It is simply the right thing to do. David
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Oct 11, 2012 2:16:38 GMT -5
|
|