Post by Helen Dagner on Mar 13, 2011 22:07:19 GMT -5
Open Letter to Terri and her sycophantic claque of psychotic willing idiots. Greetings, all. I knew both Helen (my girlfriend) and John (aquaintance and part-time room mate) in Alpena, when John was telling Helen his story, when he was drawing the maps (I held them in my hands) and when the cops came up and interviewed Helen and John. I have been aware of the discussions and investigations since then, and all along. I've never become involved with any of the online OCCK forums as I have other hobbies and interests, and since Helen is the one who John talked to and drew the maps for and everything else, she didn"t need my help. The reason I'm writing this online now, is because your latest cheap-shot lie is too low and slimy to "just let it pass'. For you to say with out proof, or truth, that Helen stole money from a fund related to these cases demands a response. Where is the proof? First, I, and the court of public opinion want two things; #1. Show documentation that such a fund even existed at that time.#2. Show proof that Helen profitted from it illegally or immorally (or in any way at all for that matter). Unless and until you do, you are just another run-of-the-mill pathetic little liar with a bad self esteem problem, trying to be "Somebody" by diminishing others. Pityful.... Anyway Dear Readers, there will be no proof, because this whole ugly smear tactic is a false accusation cooked up by the mentally deranged, hate filled, twisted weasle, "KDOG!!!(Just when you thought the monster was dead). Terri, this is reaching a new low for even you.(Just when I think you can't stoop any lower, you out do yourself). I mean, besides your other obvious short comings, you lack creativity, if you have to steal old, already debunked, disproven, sick lies from the publically disgraced and discredited 'KDOG' lunatic. So far, I haven't read any where you can weaken Helen's theory, her story or the fact that all the cops involved took her seriously and her theory seriously. In other words, Argue the merits of the cases and the evidence and try to put forth the best case for your theory and if possible, uncover any new evidence. Personal attacks are unhelpful, counterproductive and beneath the level of civil discourse among adults. It also degrades and cheapens the entire memory of the children, and is probably hurtful to their survivers. So, please stick to the case and the evidence, so I don't have to come on line again. Rick