|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Mar 30, 2011 1:53:55 GMT -5
----- Original Message --
'This leads us to think that he is living alone in the Coolidge [Road/Hwy] corridor, possibly caretaking the house while the owners, or his wife, are winter-vacationing,' a task force source said. The so-called Coolidge corridor bisects the areas where the children were abducted and their bodies later found. . . .
'He probably lives within seven or so miles of where the abductions took place and the bodies were dumped,' the source said. 'You don't have to be an expert to know not to carry bodies a long ways in a car. It's a good way to get caught.'
*
Coolidge Rd runs parallel to Woodward for the most part, and does basically intersect right near 13 & Woodward, near Jill's hobby shop. So, depending on where/what mile rd on coolidge, you could say this is still only around 5+ miles from John's..still very "home-turf".
|
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Mar 31, 2011 0:02:58 GMT -5
Helen,
I received your emails from my home AOL email but it's sometimes impossible to send AOL responses here from work due to firewall conflicts.
It would be a monumental disappointed if I were to receive a "Dear John" from the state's xxxxx office regarding the OCCK case. I would be angry yet persistent in still pursuing the matter.
I looked at the Salesian HS reunion pictures and did not recognize anyone. I never knew anyone who went to that school. If PIG HEAD is in them, I couldn't tell you. Thanks Tim
|
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Apr 1, 2011 1:16:57 GMT -5
xxxxxxx visit presents a lot of scenarios. This guy's house is no more than 4 blocks from John's and that doesn't account for cuttng through yard short cuts. That is too close to be a coincidence. John and this guy are the same age, same going nowhere life and same d**n neighborhood. If this guy is as sick as xxxxx says, John seems to be the more successful of the two - yet his family is nowhere near as affluent nor do they show him the kind of support that this other guy's parents do. Could that have been part of John's anger against society? Could this have been the friend that drove the cars John was jealous of? Finally, could John have pedophilic tendancies? Enough to have connected these two in that way? I ask because recently we found out that a guy that hung around my husband's group of friends in HS was arrested for child porn. Would I have ever guessed that about him? No way. He was just a bit odd, but I wouldn't have put him in that category. It afflicts the most unassuming people. If the DNA is a match, then I'd say it's a done deal. And I'd insist that John was closely connected to this guy. an intersting scenario with xxxx. Could they have used him as a lure? Could he have been used himself for pedo sex? Look at the guy-- he got the hell out of Michigan as soon as he could. He was "pretty." And he has spent the rest of his life trying to be anyone other than the person he was in Michigan. He suffers from a disease that is born out of stress. He became born again -- looking for salvation after a hideous past? Another reason I think John was connected is Polly's experience. She never ever said the man she ran into had facial hair and I am sure she would have mentioned that. She also said it was not a blue Gremlin, but a light colored 4 door circling the block. And we have the call list. I wonder if this guy's name is on tht list?  ? Here is another scenario. Perhaps John abducted these kids. What if he kept them at this guy's house ( after-all, the parents are gone in Europe) and offered them for sex in exchange for the hiding place. What if John was bringing them as "gifts" to this guy like buying a friend? I agree that the cleansing and placing of the kids doesn't fit with a pedophile. Again, if the DNA is a match, then the answer is there. I am also curious about the dog hair. Did this guy have a dog? What kind? I wonder if that brother would remember. Did John have a dog? What kind? When John was removed from the family home, could he have stayed with this guy? I know it seems like lots of speculation, it is. The dog hair and the missing facial hair are interesting though. xxxx |
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Apr 3, 2011 9:27:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Apr 5, 2011 0:44:59 GMT -5
"One of the biggest ideas that I've pursued has been the prosecution of cold cases. When I was sworn in as Attorney General, I created an Office of Special Investigations- a 'cold case' unit- to go through Michigan's unsolved murders, and bring today's perspectives and best practices to those cases. Sometimes, a fresh pair of eyes can make all the difference. This was an idea that hadn't been tested on this level before in Michigan, but having run the Wayne County Prosecutor's Homicide Division, I knew it was an idea whose time had come. Quite simply, as you know, local police and prosecutors are limited in following up on cold cases - but my office stands ready to help. Murder has no statute of limitations, and in Michigan, justice will know no bounds."
--Attorney General Mike Cox
Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police
February 2, 2005
|
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Apr 6, 2011 2:25:44 GMT -5
Helen, Doesn't he still need to talk to LE - even with an attorney present? He is so f--kin pompous and he has a huge ego to be involved in any discourse concerning the kids or Mckinney -insinuating he knows things. It's a fairly common trait for a serial killer - maybe PIG HEAD is our guy? Or, maybe he was an accomplice for John? Maybe they knew each other and PIG HEAD has taken great pains to NOT associate with John's name because he was an accomplice? Maybe he doesn't know a d**n thing and is just bored. Matt
Note: No One Has To Talk To LE If They Don't Want To...
|
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Apr 7, 2011 0:28:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Apr 15, 2011 22:02:40 GMT -5
Helen base on your recent posts, it appears that they are drifting further away from solving this. At least two decades ago Norberg resembles the sketch somewhat. It looks like in recent times with Chris Busch and previous Ted that they are drifting away from any resemblance at all. Did they forget about the sketches? Are they presuming the witnesses were not accurate? Don
|
|
|
|
Post by Helen Dagner on Apr 15, 2011 22:06:03 GMT -5
Don, You haven't seen anything yet. Wait until they throw McKinney in there. Not only were the witnesses not accurate but they must have been drunk on their a$$. The witnesses are off by 25 years on the suspect's age also !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
?
